<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">LNE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Lecture Notes in Education, Arts, Management and Social Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>TBA</issn><eissn>2705-053X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>WHIOCE PUBLISHING PTE. LTD.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18063/LNE.v3i11.1459</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Dialogue Between Julius Caesar and Mencius on the Justice of War</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/LNE/3/11/10.18063/LNE.v3i11.1459</url><author>MaSimiao</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-01</published-time></date></history><abstract>This article examines Brutus&amp;rsquo;s assassination of Caesar in William Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s Julius Caesar&amp;nbsp;through the framework of Mencius&amp;rsquo; theory of just war. Using the Mencian criteria of motive, means, and consequence, it offers a cross-cultural reassessment of the legitimacy of tyrannicide in the play. The study argues that Caesar does not meet Mencius&amp;rsquo; standard of a tyrant, while the violent consequences of the assassination and the reversal of public opinion undermine Brutus&amp;rsquo;s claim to justice. From the perspective of Mencian ethics, the assassination lacks a foundation in benevolence and therefore cannot be regarded as a just political act.</abstract><keywords>Mencius, Julius Caesar, outcast, benevolence</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Zhang Y, 2014, Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s Julius Caesar and Republicanism.&amp;nbsp;Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 51(03): 44-56.
[2] Shakespeare W, 1974,&amp;nbsp;The Riverside Shakespeare. Houghton Mifflin Company.
[3] Wu ZG, 2024, The Mental Foundation of the Peaceful Nature of Chinese Civilization: A Perspective from Pre-Qin Confucian and Daoist Theories of Mind, with a Discussion of Just War.&amp;nbsp;History of Chinese Philosophy, (06): 5-12.
[4] Mencius, 1970,&amp;nbsp;Mencius. Penguin Books.
[5] Zou XJ, 2024, Shakespeare Studies: Ideas and Methodologies of Yang Zhouhan.&amp;nbsp;Central Plains Literature, (13): 64-66.
[6] Proudfoot R, Thompson A, Kastan DS, et al., 2011,&amp;nbsp;The Arden Shakespeare: The Complete Works&amp;nbsp;(3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
[7] Peng L, 2017, Caesar&amp;rsquo;s Crime and Punishment? Reading Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s Julius Caesar.&amp;nbsp;Comparative Literature in China, (01): 29-38.
[8] Yu YP, Li WF, 2021, Julius Caesar: An Implicit Writing of the Conflict between Poetry and Philosophy.&amp;nbsp;Journal of Henan University (Social Sciences Edition), 61(02): 80-89.
[9] Bai TD, 2013, Benevolent Authority above Sovereignty: Mencius&amp;rsquo; Theory of Just War.&amp;nbsp;Social Sciences, (01): 131-139.
[10] Feng W, 2011, Roman Democracy: Roman Politics in Shakespeare&amp;rsquo;s Julius Caesar.&amp;nbsp;Foreign Literature Review, (03): 5-15.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
