CEFContemporary Education Frontiers3029-18793029-1860WHIOCE PUBLISHING PTE. LTD.10.18063/CEF.v3i11.1692ArticleResearch on Optimization Paths for the Whole Life Cycle Engineering Management of Low-Carbon Buildingshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/CEF/3/11/10.18063/CEF.v3i11.1692WangDan20253112025-12-20Against the backdrop of the green transformation and dual-carbon goals in the construction industry, comprehensive lifecycle engineering management for low-carbon buildings has become increasingly crucial. This paper examines the entire process, from planning and design, construction, operation and maintenance, to demolition and recycling, to analyze the core characteristics of low-carbon management and key control points at each stage. It identifies current challenges such as inadequate technology implementation, weak process control, and poor management coordination across phases, and proposes optimization strategies focusing on stage-specific improvements, collaborative mechanisms, standard development, and digital management systems. The findings provide theoretical insights and practical recommendations for enhancing low-carbon construction management and achieving carbon reduction and efficiency improvements throughout the entire project lifecycle.Low-carbon buildings, Full life cycle, Engineering management, Carbon reduction

[1] Chen F, 2025, Comparative Analysis of Low-Carbon Building Technologies based on Life Cycle Assessment. China Strategic Emerging Industries, 2025(29): 150–152. [2] Song X, Zhai S, Wang Y, 2023, Research on Low-Carbon Development Strategies for Construction Projects Throughout Their Full Life Cycle Under the “Dual Carbon” Goals. Construction Economics, 44(3): 11–17. [3] Lin X, 2024, Analysis of Low-Carbon Development Strategies for the Full Life Cycle of Construction Projects under the “Dual Carbon” Background. China Building Decoration and Renovation, 2024(6): 86–88. [4] Sun H, Wen D, Lü Z, et al., 2024, Carbon Emission Accounting of Low-Carbon Buildings Throughout their Entire Life Cycle under the “Dual Carbon” Goals. Project Management Technology, 22(8): 91–96.